Make the cells be the same or put a too close rule for editions! If it’s moved too close to another portal, one ( preferred the newest) will get out of the system ( it should not be there in the first place)! For sure that way editions will stop for more than 90%.
and of course an abbuse bottom for editions!
There shouldn't be a too close rule think that's a little unfair as ingress and WU can have more POI's. Just make the cells the same would mean any existing portals get moved over to pogo (well 90%).
With that they can just leave the 20m bloke as what ingress already has.
Hey buddy, I have some surprising news for you. You're an Ingress player too.
Where did I say I wasn't?
How can you tell who is doing bad reviews? If they have Onyx Recon, they've had at least 10,000 agreements, so the concept you're claiming is that all reviewers are bad.
Maybe that's true now that PoGo has come along and moved away from quality to quantity, and "Bad" means people following criteria.
Why does every ingress player I've spoken to use that line "done in good faith"?
Because a PoGo player using an Ingress account to submit edits designed to lower accuracy but gain them extra pokestops, is not acting in the best interest of the Portal Network. They're acting in "bad faith".
Not always. In many cases a beneficial edit can be made while keeping the marker on the building (or whatever) in question, but then 1 comes up against Ingress players looking for The Best place for it to be marked. Why they think the front door is the clear best place to mark something (and no you may not move it from there), I have no idea. People using a village hall for an event don't sit at the door.
They have the badge (in some cases multiple times over) because they are focused on agreements and they review accordingly. I've seen it from the things they say in forums and chat groups, where they coordinate their responses to candidates. No surprise their ratings went red - "but I'm amazing!?"
So your argument is that they're bad reviewers because they vote like everyone else?
Are you a better reviewer?
They vote how they think everyone else will vote and they try to coordinate how people vote and that isn't the right way to do it. They are also so focused on agreements that they hit any irrelevant 1* reason rather than hitting "doesn't meet criteria" and typing out an explanation of why it isn't valid. I suspect they spend little more than two seconds per review, and I doubt whether they look at anything other than the photo in most cases.
I have about 2000 reviews that weren't agreements (out of 5000) but I haven't dropped out of the green.
Proof of reviewers doing that?
Lots of talking but NianticCasey can't even commit to a replacement for RedSoloCup.
It's dead guys. They don't give a shite, but you all should have known that for the last 6 years.
I act disagree.... I feel the cell things proves everyone (even Ingress agents) will sometimes put multiple non visually unique portals far too close together
I think (wish) Nia would INCREASE required spacing between portals (erase many ingame existing portals)
Also I wish the edit / nomination feature would let us VOTE on portals value (eg in my local town, I can not add a Gazebo and I can not add a Town Time Capsule because years ago another agent submitted a dumb memorial tree and memorial bench... I can't legit remove them because they do exist but far better POI in that park imo and wish we had a way to nominate and get votes from players what is more valuable)
It would be ideal if the cell requirements were simply changed to include most if not all of the current waypoints. Edits would not be much of an issue after that.