Many signed nominations (codenames)
Hi. I have lately observed a predominance of nominations signed with codenames and acronyms. The most serious thing is that they end up being approved.
I mark it with 1 star -> "It doesn't meet the criteria" -> And I justify that it has codenames. However, this is not always enough.
These nominations come from PGO trainers, who clearly did not read the acceptance criteria and who want recognition from the community by signing the portals.
Portal editions are very slow in my area. So that doesn't work.
I suggest emphasizing the rules, that nominations should not be signed, much less approved.