Ridiculous rejection reasons should be appealable, and punished
I've just had this University teaching building (clearly stated in the description and supporting info) rejected as:
"private residential property or farm, Nomination does not meet acceptance criteria, Photo is low quality (e.g., pitch black/blurry photos or photos taken from a car)."
It's obvious that none of those rejection reasons are true, but I'm not going to appeal it here, instead I'm going to use this as an example of a design fault in Wayfarer.
The people who wrongly rejected this have been awarded an agreement, and people who reviewed it properly did not get an agreement, the good reviewers move towards red and the bad ones towards green. In the past, the good reviewers outnumbered the bad ones, but now, quite often they don't. This is a huge problem because there's a disincentive to reviewing properly, but no disincentive to reviewing badly. Over time, the button mashers will drive out the sensible reviewers.
If Niantic continues to let people get away with bashing the wrong buttons at random with no consequences, then there's no reason to spend time reviewing properly! Wayfarer needs an effective disincentive to stop button-mashing rejections, or they will become the norm.