Remove portal
jontebula
✭✭✭✭
Category: Portal Removal Appeal
Title: LINDSDALSBRON
Locatio: https://intel.ingress.com/intel?ll=56.736113,16.302128&z=15&pll=56.736113,16.302128
56,7361130, 16,3021280
City: Kalmar/Lindsdal
Country: Sweden
The portal dont follow critera.Not historically a very common bridge for bicycle and walking.
https://us.v-cdn.net/6031689/uploads/305/G17RUL59TNV7.jpg
1
Comments
The category is for appeals to restore wayspots that have been removed. Second, this wayspot does not meet any of the critiera for removal. A wayspot most meet that critera before it will be removed. That criteria is as follows:
The portal dont follow critera for portal. Time for Niantic to remove the portal.
Niantic only removes portals if they meet the removal criteria, which I listed. "doesn't meet [inclusion] criteria" isn't one of the removal criteria.
The portal dont follow critera.Not historically a very common bridge for bicycle and walking only.
You are not going to listen, are you? Niantic has stated that portals will only be removed if they meet the criteria for removal. "Doesn't meet criteria" is not among the criteria for removal.
Appeal Denied-Thanks for the appeal, Agent. We took another look at the Portal(s) in question and decided that it does not meet our criteria for removal at this time.
When we can report feedback about portal dont follow critera?
Actually this portal 100% meets criteria:
Q: AgentB0ss - There was a recent debate on reddit about “Bridges” being portal candidates. Regular car bridges clearly should not be portals, however what about wooden walking trail bridges throughout a park or nature preserve on the trail/path?
A: The answer from NIA OPS is, “If they are accessible by foot and expected to be used as part of the trail, they would meet criteria.”