Turn back the Sequence of Rating in Wayfarer
Especially on phone the sequence of rating is completely weird: You have to first rate whether a portal is worthy and then rate the special aspects like historical/optical/safety a.s.o., why it is worthy.
It would be much better to firstly rate the individual aspects and then give a mark for the whole appearance.
I assume that you made a decision about your design concerning that aspect. So why did you design it this way?
Post edited by xxxZaphodxxx on
1
Comments
The order is almost the SAME as Mobile when it was OPR. The only difference is Location/Access is flipped.
Now I agree mobile reviewing in Wayfarer is clunky.
Having had the same in OPR doesn't make it better. It is just not the logical line of judging. You first see the individual aspects and then think of an overall rate. Not the other way round as it is.
I found OPR as bad as Wayfarer concerning this point. But as OPR was much more clunky, it was not so obvious ;-)
One should give the stars for "portalworthy" as their last step, not as their first one.
It is already the same as OPR... Youve always seen the photo first, then the title/description.... Its in the SAME exact order already besides Location/Access. Overall Rating was always first, then Title/Desc, then Historic/Culture, then Visual...
Just repeating your text doesnt answer any question. It was weird all the time! It was just more clunky, so that you had to go back and forth and so it was not so obvoius. I am not a noob.
Your saying the review sequence in Wayfarer is different than OPR and asking for it to be reverted. However, the review sequence is the same? I am so very confused at what you are saying is different in Wayfarer Versus OPR.
Oh My God! Read!! I never talked about any difference between OPR and Wayfarer! I did not even mention OPR in my post. But YOU now managed to spam this thread with nonsense, Thank you. Did I misuse the word "revert"? I m not english mother tongue. I meant "revert the sequence" not "revert to a previous behaviour".
Revert means to return to a previous state, so then what reversion are you talking about?
Ok, sorry. I changed the topic to "turn back". Better? The intention should have been clear if you read more than the caption
. I want do do it the other way round.
As you've been educated, I'll now add a bit.
We were always told to accept or reject based on the image alone. If you accept the image, then you rate other aspects...
To revert as you request, would be to remove players from the equation and to have Nia solely review.
For any latecomers, he/she has now removed the word revert, and is now using better capitalisation.
No
Honestly, Turn back/Revert are about the same.
I would say Reverse the order of review items in Wayfarer.
However as @LemoMcLemonFace you should be judging primarily off the photo first to determine if its eligible. If you later find something preventing it such as the location or accessibility then you can go change it to 1*
What is your usual way to judge a common life situation? Fistly get your judgement and then see the details or the other way round?
But that's the point. If you later find anything obstructing your first decision, e.g., seeing it in a private garden or being a duplicate, you have to scroll all the way up to your first decision to change it,. Thats not user friendly. So why not designing the user interface in the way that your decision works?
Actually, its been studied and your brain makes immediate judgement based on visual stimulants first then later uses other senses including sight again to clarify situations. This goes back to the fight or flight that's built into everyone. Studies show it takes as little as 13 milliseconds to process a full scene around you.
Okay so lets say you reverse the order and you see based on the first thing you review it should be rejected immediately, you then have to equally scroll to the very bottom to mark the nomination 1* there is little difference in scrolling up or down if you are immediately rejecting after seeing something is wrong with it.
I kind of agree with them, it's especially better to see the whole picture for things like businesses and it's likely why everyone is so quick to use it. Maybe forcing users to view the whole before making a decision will lesson things like capchas and quick rejects
I can agree with that aspect, however the picture will be displayed first, then title/description and then the items to be reviewed/marked. If someone is going to mark it anyways they won't likely read anything else. However, it could stop a couple of users.
I wish they had a way to force users to acknowledge the read the details and didn't just immediately reject on picture alone but I don't think anything will 100% prevent this.
Yeah since they have a catagory of acceptance that requires users to explain the cool story or history or cultural significance of an object I've always found it strange to have reviewers rate the submission from first impressions, especially the quick 1* and never see the rest of the details.
Honestly they expect users to read everything first.
I guess somewhere in the middle, See Picture/Title/Description Submission Statement/Extra Picture THEN rate portal worthy, title, culture, visual, access, and location. That probably makes most sense.