is this portal worth?
Glas-Allt Shiel Bothy.
Description
Glas-allt Shiel has been a bothy since 1991 built for her majesty Queen Victoria in 1868 as a hunting lodge.
google maps link https://goo.gl/maps/j7hHiJ49nUZPFLFaA
openstreet map https://www.openstreetmap.org/?mlat=56.927282&mlon=-3.190459&zoom=14#map=14/56.9273/-3.1905
Tagged:
0

Comments
Presuming not prp, I'd say yes.
Looks pretty cool. You could even link this wiki about it in the support statement https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glas-allt-Shiel
prp?
Private residential property
It would be 1-star as a private residential property unless you can show that it is being used as a museum or open for tours.
it's not a Private residential property
it's a bothy a place for overnight stays for hikers
it's a historic site
part of wikipedia entry
Open bothy[edit]
Glas Allt in the foreground with the lodge behind. The bothy is reached down the passageway between the rear of the lodge and the outhouse (right).
Since 1991 an outhouse at the back of the lodge was maintained by Dundee University Rucksack Club as an open bothy until in 2019 it passed to the Mountain Bothies Association– it is a good base for climbing Lochnagar.[43][44][45][46] Equipped with a stove and a composting toilet (as well as a candelabra) it used to be a storeroom and is now available to anyone free of charge for overnight stays. However, there is no electricity, the water supply is from the Glas Allt very near by, and there is no fuel unless it has been left by previous users.[43][47] When royal parties are visiting the lodge backpackers are still allowed to stay in the bothy but they are asked to keep discreetly out of the way.
Then you must provide such details in your discription and your submission statement. Otherwise, reviewers will mark it as PRP because there is nothing else to indicate it is anything different.
Did you even look at anything besides the picture? It's obviously not PRP.
Did you read the thread?
I instigated the PRP comments by stating, presuming a it's not prp, yes.
I didn't follow any of the link, I skimmed the text, I based my opinion on the image alone.
Yes. My reply was to somebody else after information had already been added showing it's not PRP
There was nothing obvious that indicated that it was anything but private residential property. All I had to go on was a name, a basic description that it was a home, and two map links that didn't indcate that it was anything other than PRP. DO NOT PRESUME that whoever is reviewing the nomination has any prior knowladge about the POI or the location.
Not in original post but from well before yours
I was basing my response to the OP. There was nothing in the OP that indicated that it was anything other than private residential property.