BAN OPR ABUSERS!

When is Nia. going to ban those who constantly abuse OPR. We have found in our small community that just because we hold regional control that a certain group of agents out of spite are clearly rejecting legitimate submissions.

Tagged:
«13

Comments

  • yeah works both ways - ban for abuse - Nia outlined this when OPR was rolled out, yet we see nothing, if at all there is an escalation of abuse!

  • IvernIvern ✭✭

    Essa realidade é triste, porém muito comum. Tem pessoas que negam por maldade e outras que simplesmente nem conhecem os critérios, avaliam para ganhar pontos de medalha da maneira que acham corretos (sem seguir as regras)

  • TheismanTheisman ✭✭✭✭✭

    @DSoT88 out of interest, how have you found this out and what actual proof do you have ?

  • HydracyanHydracyan ✭✭✭✭✭

    How can you be so sure it was legitimate submission?

  • GrnTyrantGrnTyrant ✭✭
    edited June 2019

    @Hydraulinski Give me a break!, simple because they meet the criteria!

    Post edited by GrnTyrant on
  • GrnTyrantGrnTyrant ✭✭
    edited June 2019

    Well @Theisman

    1) Not a Nia rejection

    2) Meets the criteria set out for a portal candidate

    3) Smurfs play a hate game in our region.


    Hope that clarifies it up for ya.

    Post edited by GrnTyrant on
  • jplolojplolo ✭✭✭✭

    My suggestion is to do your best with gathering a solid amount of proof, then submitting it as a complaint with Niantic's help department. I'd like to know their response and how they plan to handle such falsities. OPR ban seems like a good start.

  • @jplolo good luck getting a response from the so-called help department.

  • jplolojplolo ✭✭✭✭

    @DSoT88 I have pretty good luck getting help from them. It usually takes a few days, and I've had to follow up before, but I've always gotten a response that fixes my problem or advises me on what to do next.

  • @jplolo sounds like your an exception to the rule with the many issues you to seem to encounter. interesting.

  • jplolojplolo ✭✭✭✭

    Well, poop. Yeah, that is interesting. I do tend to provide a ton of screenshots and data, and so on, in hopes of being taken seriously right away. Not sure if that has anything to do with it.

  • GrnTyrantGrnTyrant ✭✭
    edited June 2019

    @Theisman Your not actually adding value to the conversation by blatantly denying that abuse occurs, wide spread issue, recognized by others that they have the same issue. Go bury your head back in the sand, unless you can come up with something constructive to add. Gez I wonder why Nia then created a violation clause of a non-existent issue according to you. 🙃 My advice is to listen to the community and the numerous issues around OPR, reddit is a good source outlining the same issues surrounding abuse.

    Post edited by GrnTyrant on
  • Chances are "No", I am fully aware of sub guidelines. Chances are you need to brush up on the issues plaguing OPR. Please add in constructive responses in future.

  • GrnTyrantGrnTyrant ✭✭
    edited June 2019

    @Theisman your now confusing yourself, if "you" care to read the brief correctly! There is no mention that its limited to one faction. To continue to demand "proof" is seriously erroneous. One hate's repeating themselves but for your sake here goes. (There was a violation clause on OPR abuse). You are clearly ill-informed on the subject matter and are mis-leading agents that OPR abuse does not exist. Please stop hi-jacking this thread repeating the same ill-informed comments.

    Post edited by GrnTyrant on
  • TheismanTheisman ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited June 2019

    @DSoT88 You stated it yourself in your opening post that it was one group of agents due to the fact it is an area held by another

    You also again claimed that it is resistance agents that are causing your submissions to be rejected.

    In order to prove abuse you need proof that it is happening otherwise it is your word against theres, and as you are unwilling or unable to provide proof, or even provide details of your submissions on here in order for their quality to be judged, you are simply failing to help yourself.

    You can claim abuse all you want, but you have not provided ANYTHING to substantiate your claims or even proved that your submissions are of sufficent quality.

  • ArtilectZedArtilectZed ✭✭✭✭✭

    I'm sorry you're not getting the responses you hoped for here, but you have yet to show any proof, and it appears that you're making baseless claims. It's literally impossible for portal submissions to be denied because "We have found in our small community that just because we hold regional control that a certain group of agents out of spite are clearly rejecting legitimate submissions." If you understood how OPR works, you would realize that. Good luck fooling yourself farther, though, you seem stuck thinking that you have to.

  • Let me put this in laymen's terms for those struggling to understand the brief.

    (a) Once again @Theisman @ArtilectZed @TheFarix are failing to understand or even grasp the concept of abuse by denying it even exists, obviously you have never herd of the term circumstantial evidence? To help you all, there are 2 types; "Direct" and in this case "Circumstantial". With OPR there is more than enough evidence to support a case for guilt without providing the "Direct" evidence. Obviously, to get "Direct" evidence one would have to obtain data from Nia.   

    (b) There is a Nia. policy clause for OPR abuse!. There's plenty complaints about where smaller communities are experiencing the same problem, therefore my advice to you is to spend time reviewing & educating yourself more on the subject matter.

    (c) @Theisman is Mis-quoting. Where???? did I state "one group", I stated "certain group" if you care to re-read again & understand the brief.  

    So please once again stop MIS-Quoting & MIS-Informing the ingress community abuse does not exist.

  • TheismanTheisman ✭✭✭✭✭

    You have stated here in your own post who you believe are playing a hate game.

    If you believe you have evidence then please detail it as currently all you have done is claim abuse without evidence, circumstantial or otherwise.

    Again you have failed to provide any details what so ever about your submission candidates so their quality can be assessed or the evidence of abuse you say you have experienced.

This discussion has been closed.