Random irrelevant commentary on Ingress Portal descriptions
Need a consensus on this. As a reviewer, for the last three months I have come across an agent somewhere in rural New South Wales is always puts "google maps outdated" in the description of the portal. I rate these badly since it shouldn't be in the portal description, and it seems other agents who review the portal share the sentiment.
The poor agent's heart is getting crushed because they're wondering why their portals aren't going through. To be honest, I can often check on more updated maps in the country's website and verify their existence, but the description doesn't cut it for me. So they're just going after rejection after rejection until they can slip one in (which is a bit rare).
Is it possible to give feedback on these portals? As to not include "google maps outdated" or to place the location marker on the actual portal and not the middle of the road? Education is key, and I really think the comments used on my rating decision if they're constructive should be communicated to the agent anonymously.