Ban appeal for [redacted]

b1bb3rb1bb3r ✭✭

again about the ENL linkstar yesterday in a closed parc in Antwerp (Middelheim).

Just like there is no reason to ban [redacted] , [redacted], [redacted] there should be no reason for banning Beul80.

Working your way into a closed parc, by telling a small lie to a guard about a lost key, is not spoofing....

If it would be considered trespassing (it is not), it is surly not a reason for a ban. Where is the 1 2 3 step program for that? I reported several players in the past about trespassing, never had any reaction. never applied even step 1

If a vanguard is playing with the impacted team, he is surly biased in his opinion and emotions go high

Please reverse the decisions and lift the ban of these players.

Post edited by NianticThia on
Tagged:
«1

Comments

  • Totally agree Thank for your post

  • dirkvinkdirkvink ✭✭

    I'm not approving , but Beul80 knowing he is brazen enough to really have entered the park.

This discussion has been closed.