You mean Perringaiden?
That one was already that way even before.
There are community guidelines that apply to all, including XMA. The guidelines have a section on treating others with respect.
A deprival of XMA would be better than discussion. That specific XMA does not have the basic moral accomplishment to be an "ambassador", by deliberately calling other players idiots in public. Details described in (but unfortunately for Niantic's eye only) https://community.ingress.com/en/discussion/14482/why-my-comment-s-removed-when-disagree-attackers-incl-xm-ambassador-insulting-players-in-public
I'm the one that called you an **** in the chat, remember? You decide to run on a campaign for reasons I and many other agents can not comprehend at this point.
If you think bringing up a public Telegram chatroom to push an agenda to drag people into the mud from the ****
Campaign? No. It's helping players to Meet the XM Ambassadors!
Quote to archive the fact confirmed by one of the parties involved that the screenshot uploaded by other agents in the post for which I provided link, shows exactly two agents with corresponding username matching their Ingress account codename.
One of them is a so-called XMA. And they do feel good about insulting other players with dirty words, until now.
I’d be curious to check the numbers on how active these XMAs have been since becoming one. I know that was supposed to be a metric for becoming one, though we also know they ignored it as some XMAs had more or less never used the forums. So curious to see how that’s going… I would think with 40-50 of them, we’d see the XMA tag more often..
That was one of the metrics Niantic used to check for agents to enroll as XMAs, but not necessarily a primary determinant. Many of the XMAs speak english as a second language, and the primary goal of the XMA program was to connect players to the community better (ie, aid players in our given parts of the community with accessing player tools). Determining XMA activity by forums would be an unfair way to rate all XMAs.
I wasn’t rating them. Just curious to see if those numbers have changed or not. I know Niantic does what they want, including ignoring their own requirement to get into the program, so, mostly just curiosity.
Wow. So that XMA really did some shaming soon after and due to the fact that he lost a debate in anti-spoofing post?
Insulted others first but not expected to be revenged successfully, still resorting to throwing bad words for now. Sweet.
So, any ambassadors wanna comment how things have been going? Do you think this has been helpful to the game? Do you feel like you got anything out of it?
Also curious to see how these numbers have changed over the past year….
I think a number of those answers are limited by the NDA. Though publicly the biggest thing I got was a bunch of people complaining that "Niantic representatives" weren't agreeing with them on the forums. 🤣
Lost the original dataset, so had to recreate it:
List sorted by number of days since last active
Data is available here if anybody wants to play with it.
XaviDarker93 has renamed their account and is now named @sXavierI. Their profile is private however, I'm sadly not the only one anymore who found that setting 🙈
Awww, my %s don't look great, because my initial values were high. sadface
I mean, just saying, it’s been good or it’s worthwhile doesn’t seem like it would break an NDA, but also, fair enough. Your reply does offer some insight, heh. Thanks!
Haha, ok that was incredibly easy to find, once I was aware of it being a thing anyway
Hello and thank you for... Being y'all.